Kopfbereich

Direkt zum Inhalt Direkt zur Navigation
CLJS has opened up their online t-shirt store. Buy one of their popular "Statue of Liberty" t-shirts for only $10 with your credit card or PayPal account online!
 

Inhalt

Trashing the trispalvė
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 2
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.02.21 13.27

Image
Fascists during a Jan. 13 commemoration. lrytas.lt
Nothing sets off an identity crisis like a millennial jubilee! Lithuania continues to play the role of jittery bride in the run up to the celebrations of 2009.

First, we’ve had the problems over the question of why citizens of the Republic Lithuania must be citizens of the Republic of Lithuania alone (the propagandized diaspora version of this you may have heard is: “why should ethnic Lithuanians not be allowed to get Lithuanian citizenship”—which they are still, of course, allowed to get...), and now a new dilemma arises, sparked for me by a rather emotional email I was forwarded:

Subject: Our Lithuanian Flag: Endangered?!?

Labas!  
Can you imagine our Lithuanian Flag without its yellow, green and red?!?
 
There are some in Lithuania who are interested in changing the design of the Lithuanian flag.

Danute Bindokiene in her Feb. 3rd editorial in Draugas explains the info on the Jan. 8th "TV Forumas" related to changing the Lithuanian Flag from the national (yellow, green and red) to the state flag (knight on a red background). Danute gives historical background and her reasons why the tricolor flag should be retained and asks everyone to participate in a survey to Draugas with a simple yes or no or by writing more in your response.
Of course I can imagine a Lithuanian Flag without the tricolor (“trispalvė”). In fact, for the large majority of the time that there has been a Lithuanian state, it has used as a flag the very state flag mentioned above. That flag incorporates historical symbols of the Lithuanian state that date back to the 14th century. The tricolor, on the other hand, is a phantasmatic representation of a Lithuanian nation (not state)—being nothing more than an ethnic/nationalist symbol and not, importantly, a symbol of the apparatus of the state.

In fact, I'm glad that the people of Lithuania are acknowledging the difference between the Lithuanian state and the Lithuanian nation by engaging in this debate, as it points to a future Lithuania which is more in touch with the contemporary European situation and with the tolerant tradition of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which I discuss further below.
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.02.21 20.12 )
 
Romanov: Old Firm buys off refs
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.02.15 10.24

ImageI haven't written much about Hearts this year for two reasons: 1. I haven't written much about anything at all. 2. Hearts's semi-magical season last year has definitely not repeated itself after crashing out of Europe and failing to challenge for the top of the table in the SPL.

Apparently, Vladimir Romanov has also been sort of disappointed in this year's performance from his most expensive team. And he's looking both within and without for someone to blame. He unloaded in the most recent issue of “Футбол,” saying that Celtic and Rangers pay off both refs and players on other teams, going so far as to suggest that FBK Kaunas could, given a truly level playing field, take on the Old Firm. The Daily Record translates his comments into English

Celtic and Rangers? Even Kaunas are a match for them on the pitch.The thing is they've turned football into a type of showbusiness with their underhand games.

They buy off players and referees. When it comes to weaker teams then nobody can help but if two opponents are equally matched then the referees can have a real influence on the outcome.

Fantastic. Of course, the SFA will be fining him (again), and he may even get sued. 

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.02.15 10.35 )
 
Vilnius, the Commodity
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.01.24 22.16

As I've milked for almost a year, the first emails I got about inCulto's video for "Welcome (to Lithuania)" were that it was a video developed by a tourist agency. Laughable, still, especially the more and more I watch the video and hear the song. Still there do exist videos made to sell Vilnius as a tourist destination, and they're making a return to BBC and CNN in England this March. As the Baltic Times writes:

The commercial is the second production of a televised ad campaign to entice tourists to Vilnius. The Vilnius Board of Tourism began the project in 2005, a year after all three Baltic states joined the European Union and NATO.

“The idea was to make something that was exciting, vibrant, inviting and upbeat,” says the commercial’s director, Donatas Ulvydas. “The Vilnius Board of Tourism wanted to portray people - real people - and feature them in various parts of the capital in order to present Vilnius as a happening European city with exciting possibilities. They wanted to show a city with trendy hotels and modern conveniences, a city full of energy with shiny glass buildings, without forgetting the charming Vilnius Old Town that tourists know and love.”

There's something very disturbing about the article as a whole, in how it engages in its own selling of Vilnius, but, in any case, the video's on YouTube, and here it is, Vilnius For Sale:

How do you respond to this video? With ethnic pride? Does it make you a bit queasy? What iconography of "Vilnius" or of "Lithuania" do you feel it overdoes? What iconography does it totally neglect? 

 
What Else Is New
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.01.23 09.45

ImageI've been busy, yes, and unable to complete the discussion about the Lithuanian citizenship brouhaha—but it's also become a huge issue that's getting covered on artcles in Amerikos lietuvis and the like. So, I doubt I have anything particularly interesting or new to say. I'm not a immigration lawyer, after all. Plus, I'm behind the ball by now, etc., etc.

I've come back from Brazil, and I will have an article written about the time spent there for PLJS. As for the non-PALJS Suvažiavimas parts, I can only say that Rio is (still) a great city, and I would really like to return again soon—but this time I would hope that the rain could stay in the mountains. We had a lot of fun there, but we didn't stray far from Copacabana. That's only half a complaint; it was really the rain that was dragging us down (and that continued, unfortunately, in São Paulo). São Paulo is, I imagine, a far less impressive city than Rio, or, at least, that's what I get from my time there. It just seems really huge.

In any case, I'm still very eager to start posting here again with some regularity. I hope to start with uploading photos from my trip (there are about 700 that I consider worth putting online), but am not sure that this site's infrastructure is up for it. In general, it seems like the photo aspect of this site is losing steam. Before sites like Facebook and flickr existed, the photos on Lithchat served a noble task. Now, however, the site is slow in comparison to the pro sites, and uploading/commenting/searching/etc. is far more complex, slow, and unrewarding. Furthermore, it seems like I'm the only person still interested in uploading photos on Lithchat, and that's really too bad.

I'm investigating starting up a semi-private, multiple-user contributed photo site on one of the pro sites, but I'm not sure which way to go. Suggestions?

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.01.24 22.09 )
 
<< Pradėti < Prieš 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kitas > Pabaiga >>

Rezultatai 37 - 40 iš 123