Kopfbereich

Direkt zum Inhalt Direkt zur Navigation
CLJS has opened up their online t-shirt store. Buy one of their popular "Statue of Liberty" t-shirts for only $10 with your credit card or PayPal account online!
 

Inhalt

What should Lithuania look like?
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.06.18 15.59

ImageWhat a gift! Just as I was about to start researching a boring article for lithchat about lustration, Labas.blog drops a pleasant piece about an online competition at Delfi to create Lithuania’s “vizitine kortele.” Labas.blog takes on the issues of limiting oneself to the trispalvė (as it’s a color scheme already very much in use throughout the Global South) and of emphasizing on ąžuolai and švyturiai as symbolic of the nation.

Delfi includes examples of tourist logos from other nations (the one for Spain has haunted me for years). This serves as a reminder that other countries have fared rather well without reincorporating their national flags into their logo. The Czech Republic's logo, for example, creates a world of multitude by having a five-colored palette of voice balloons. Brazil coyly addresses its own national unity through miscegenation in its overlapping puddles of different colors. In fact, with “BRASIL” in negative (i.e. white) space, it almost suggests that the state apparatus, which holds the nation together is cut out and removed from the cultural life of the nation. Or that whites run the state.

I’ve made my issues with the fetishization of geltona-žalia-raudona clear before, and I think I would almost reflexively support whatever logo manages to say something about “Lithuania! The Tourist Spot!” without resorting to those colors, though my issues are less related to Lithuanian exceptionalism (the underlying theme of the Labas.blog post) and more political: there’s something odd about adopting the color scheme of the definitionally exclusionary nation-state in order to create a logo that screams, “come from abroad and spend your money here!”

ImageThis being the case, of the options available, I think I like the third the most. “PAPRASTA - ŽALIA” read the two attributes assigned to the nation, and they are rather nice attributes, though “paprasta” can quickly become a source of mockery, and, well, Lithuania’s credentials as “green” are somewhat lacking, also. Still, it's something to strive for. Also, the logo reproduces amazingly well in monochrome and with a limited palette—both are crucial aspects of logo design for me (despite the multicolored monster I created for the next Pasaulio lietuvių jaunimo kongresas). Furthermore, the tree itself recreates the patterns we're used to seeing on juostos or žiurstai or whatever, without being species specifc (an oak tree) to the point of making a useless claim for exceptionalism. In fact, going over the logos again, it's a no-brainer.

ImageOf the others, the next one that strikes me aesthetically the best is the ninth, the lighthouse with “Atrask mane” underneath. Unfortunately, the logo ends up being an ad for sex tourism, with the lighthouse now a comely young woman with ribbons in her hair. I’ve been sniffing covert sex tourism in advertising for Lithuania for years now, and it seems like the designers of the logo could have been a bit smarter about that. I can’t look at that logo now and imagine anything other than pouring out of Brodvėjus at 4am and playing a game of hide-n-seek as the girl steps of a curb. Atrasiu... Atrasiu, nesirūpink... 

Image

Three of the logos incorporate a lot of blue, though they all, also, still incorporate the trispalvė, making t-shirt printing more expensive (that being one of the reasons a good monochrome logo is best). One has three psuedopods escaping either from a whirlpool (is that Moscow? Kaliningrad? the EU?). That blue spiral can also be a giant fingerprint, suggesting a laughable commitment to a totalitarian state. Lithuania may be unique like a fingerprint (whatever that means), but the idea of fingerprinting all tourists is one I think the US has monopoly claim to. The next logo I simply fail to understand. Are those foam noodles floating in the Nemunas? If your logo looks like spaghetti, you may need to reconsider. The last blue logo, calling Lithuania “refreshing,” serves as an ad for a bottled water company, from perhaps 1988. There's something disturbing about having a huge point of impact in your logo, as though the tourist has to choose which path he or she will take. That strikes me as too stressful. Also, I can’t stop thinking about cocaine when I see that logo, for some reason. (Is coke refreshing? Diet Coke Plus certainly is...)

The other logos strike me as generally amateurish, but they are still there for you to check out to your heart’s content. Delfi does not give the vote results after your vote (yes, I voted for Nr. 3). But what would your logo look like? I think that, all told, mine might look essentially exactly like Nr. 3, though probably a bit more obviously like a pattern from a juosta and a bit less like a logo on the back of a carton of Tropicana.

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.06.19 06.38 )
 
Middle-ground in Tallinn
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.05.11 00.14

Image
Facebook group supporting Estonia
After a day spent learning about 20th Century German history, my friends and I decided to lighten things up with a jaunt through the Tiergarten in Berlin, on our way to the Reichstag building in the summer of 2003. Rather surprisingly, while cutting across the heavily wooded space, we came upon a two Red Army tanks and artillery, flanking a huge stone space, guarded (if not crushed) by the overbearing presence of a larger than life Soviet soldier. Hand outstreched in an inverted Nazi salute, he seemed to be drowning something.

What was this space? We were in what was once West Berlin, after all. Why was this part of the Tiergarten so done up? And, more importantly, why did the huge golden inscription under the soldier explain, in Russian that this area was for the “Eternal glory to the heroes, fallen in battle with the German fascist invaders for the freedom and independence of the Soviet Union” (Вечная слава героям павшим в боях с немецко-фашистскими захватчиками за свободу у независимость Советского Союза)? After all, only a few meters away was Marcks’sDer Rufer,” who stares toward the Brandenburger Tor and shouts, as though at the Iron Curtain, “I go around the world and shout, ‘Peace! Peace! Peace!’” (Ich gehe durch die Welt und rufe Friede Friede Friede)

Once we approached, we found a small, informative display. We had stumbled upon the Sowjetisches Ehrenmal, a cenotaph constructed (from stone, apparently, from the Reichskanzlei) in the deforested park in 1945 (with the destroyed Reichstag still in view) to commemorate precisely what is written under the soldier, specifically the 20k or so Soviet soldiers who perished in April and May of 1945 defeating the Nazis. That the cenotaph was in West Berlin seems to have been an fluke of history—borders drawn post facto—and, during the split in the city, apparently Soviet troops would still stand on patrol by their obsolete artillery, in the middle of the Tiergarten.

I can understand the eagerness with which the Red Army wanted to construct a memorial to their fallen comrades in the middle of the capital of their now vanquished enemy. What surprised me was the astonishing condition in which the monument remained, despite being in West Berlin and despite being now totally under the control of the government of Berlin in the fancy, new Bundesrepublik.

Every time I read yet another article about the current situation in Tallinn, I recall this Ehrenmal. It strikes me that neither side of the conflict is doing a particularly good job of being intellectually (or historically) honest, and that both the Estonian and Russian governments should take a page out of the “nie wieder” form of historical memory present throughout Berlin—from the Jüdisches Museum to the new roof of the Reichstag building that forever reminds the viewed of its torching to help Hitler’s rise to power on the backs of communists. I can’t, in good conscience, say I support either side of the conflict; I can only hope, which I aim to make clear on the flip, that a sensible middle ground can be found, if not in the actions of the governments, then at least in the minds of those agitating on one side or the other.

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.05.11 21.15 )
 
Lithchat and the End of Photos
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 5
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.04.11 13.28

I was approached over Easter in Toronto by an old fan of the Lithchat photo section, who asked if the site, as a whole, was defunct now. No, obviously, it's not. But he was asking about the lack of activity regarding what made the site popular—unlimited photo uploading from pretty much anyone who wanted to upload photos. Yes, I explained, there aren't new photos on lithchat since providing that kind of service is available all around now, on sites that have easier interfaces, better servers, and faster connections. It's ridiculous to run your own image server in 2007 when you're just a punk with a P5 sitting in the basement.

After researching a few online photo options, then, I've thrown in with flickr.com (feature tour). This is mostly since they allow me (for a ludicrously low annual fee) to upload as many photos as I want. The interface is fantastic (very AJAXy), and I can do all sorts of things on the fly that were a series of clumsy POSTs in the old gallery interface on the old lithchat. Furthermore, many of the main lithchat photo contributors have already made the jump to flickr, and I encourage you all to do the same.

What this means:

  1. No new photos are being posted to Lithchat. In fact, eventually even the photos here will be moved to flickr and then removed from here.
  2. All new photos should go to the "lithchat" group on flickr (over 600 photos already there).

It's pretty cool that we can have a somewhat regulated group on flickr; the lithchat group there is currently by invitation only, so that we won't have the problems this Lithchat had—namely of being open to the whole world (employers, students, parents, significant others, etc.). Of course, if a flickr user keeps her own photos publicly visible, then the security structures built into the flickr group won't matter a lick.

But in order to ask to be a member of the lithchat flickr group, one must first be a member of flickr:

To join flickr and request to join the lithchat flickr group: 

  1. Obviously, go to http://www.flickr.com and follow the directions to join.
  2. (If you have a yahoo! login, you can just use that... ah, monopolistic synergy!)
  3. Then, once you're logged in, go to http://www.flickr.com/groups/lithchat/ and follow the directions there to join.

Remember, because the lithchat flickr group is open only to invited members, you must be a member just to see the photos there. And though my own photos, currently, are publicly available, that will probably change, too, in the near future.

But what about facebook?

It's pretty clear that a huge bulk of the photos that would've, six years ago, been going up on lithchat are now going on facebook. (I have friends with more photos of just themselves on facebook than I have photos, total, uploaded.) The problem with just throwing in with facebook is that, though their model of person tagging is great, there exist a lot of serious limitations to the facebook photo interface, most notably in the way the photos are shared among huge groups at once in ways that don't rely being on facebook nearly constantly.

As anyone who knows me knows, I'm pretty much addicted to facebook. I'll continue uploading my own photos (in smaller sample sizes) to fb as well as to the flickr group. But I also know that facebook is working on a way of interacting with flickr APIs, so it may not be so long from now when the two work together to provide you with more information about what your friends are up to, which was, always, one of the basic points of lithchat. I know that now it seems like there is competition for your online photo viewing time, but I ask for patience while these two corporations figure themselves out.

So in conclusion, I'm going to leave this post up for a while. I'm also changing the links on the front page around so that the photo aspect of the site gets down-pedaled. For now, however, you can still use this link to get to the old photos: http://www.lithchat.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/

 
Racist Polish Children
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2007.03.21 15.55
ImageEarlier this week there were reports of Western Europeans trashing the East: a Briton was caught urinating on the freedom monument in Riga as his friends filmed his water-making. This goes against, of course, the British Embassy in Riga's guidelines for responsible tourism, which include: “Do not urinate in public - always use a toilet.”

But today we see that boorish behavior moves from east to west, too. Reprinting an article from Życie Warszawy, Lietuvos rytas tells us that there are near daily complaints about racist behaviour by Polish children in schools in Britain:
Dienraštis pažymi, jog dauguma lenkų moksleivių stengiasi pabrėžti, jog būdami baltieji, jie yra geresni už kitus mokinius ir mokytojus. Jie nenori sėdėti viename suole su pakistaniečiu ar kitu tamsiaodžiu emigrantu ar net rūbinėje greta kabinti savo paltą.
Someday I'll write a post about racism in the Baltics (I've been collecting links to articles for months), but this article struck me as very peculiar, as I explain after the jump.
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2007.03.21 22.37 )
 
<< Pradėti < Prieš 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kitas > Pabaiga >>

Rezultatai 29 - 32 iš 123