|
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira
|
|
2008.03.14 13.06 |
 Borat visits Lithuania. A sign: if one promises to write a three-part post and can barely push the first part out in a timely manner, that post should probably be dropped. So considering that since V-16, Kovo 11 has come and gone without my finishing my article on why V-16 is not a holiday I’m particularly eager to celebrate, I’ll put those ideas aside and move to a few other things that have been bubbling in my head. Just before Lithuania’s second independence day , Lietuvos rytas printed an interview with Erran Baron Cohen, a musician whose brother, Sacha, is better known to the world as the mastermind behind Borat. Erran explained that he had just recently found out that his great grandfather was born in Kaunas. From there, his family moved to Wales, where Baron Cohen’s grandfather was born. When I pointed this out to a friend of mine, he said that he wasn’t surprised to learn of Baron Cohen’s Lithuanian ancestry, waggishly adding that Borat’s “Running of the Jews” was just a reformulation of the Shrove Tuesday “Užgavėnių paradas.” And it is this cultural intersection that I’m writing about after the flip. |
|
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2008.03.18 08.52 )
|
|
Skaityti toliau...
|
|
|
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira
|
|
2008.02.28 01.49 |
[Introduction] The anti-commememoration of the 90th anniversary of V-16 begins with this contextual piece, providing a few paths of inquiry into understanding what the circumstances were that led to the establishment of the Republic of Lithuania. I’m not, importantly, a historian. At best, I'm a literary critic. As such, this context is badly simplified, but it is at least not as simplified as the politically dubious version of Lithuanian history available at Saturday school or summer camp. As a literary critic, then, I can begin with these lines of a poem:
Tėvyne Lietuva, mielesnė už sveikatą! Kaip reik tave branginti, vien tik tas pamato, Kas jau tavęs neteko.
They are the opening lines of a poem published in 1834 by a graduate of Vilnius University and classmate of the father of Lithuanian History, Simonas Daukantas. The lines are majestic in their emotive strength, tied in precisely with the vogue of romantic poetry. The speaker is alone, thinking of his homeland Lithuania, dearer to him than his very health. And this dearness and importance is amplified by the fact that he, and anyone who loves their homeland Lithuania, loves it the more since they know, and have felt, what it is like not to have a homeland to love.
|
|
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2008.02.28 11.48 )
|
|
Skaityti toliau...
|
|
|
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira
|
|
2008.02.18 15.48 |
 Lietuvos Taryba. wikipedia Vincas asked me last week if I had any special plans for celebrating V-16, the 90th anniversary of the 1918 Lithuanian Declaration of Independence. His question struck me as odd; I never considered doing something other than, say, going down to Champaign to get drunk with the Baltic Club, as they now host a Champaign V-16 Bar Crawl for the second year.I hated V-16 as a kid, as the holiday was always marked with boring minėjimai in the claustrophobic basement of St. Peter’s in South Boston. And now that I’m an adult, the stench of strident nationalism has kept me away (as has abject laziness, academic commitments, Super Mario Galaxy, u.s.w.).
The stark way that Vincas asked the question, though, made me feel odd for not commemorating the event, so I decided to stage an anti-commemoration of sorts on these pages. That is, I’m not so certain that V-16 deserves our commemorating. The establishment of the Republic of Lithuania involved a lot of hard decisions regarding several competing tensions, all tugging away at different views of what that part of Europe should look like. It strikes me that in choosing as they did, the Lietuvos Taryba perhaps did more harm than good, creating animosities that last to this day. And while I hesitate to affix a valuative judgment on the enterprise as a whole, I think that a deeper understanding is very, very useful as a way of refashioning a self-understanding as “Lithuanian.”
The next three posts, then, will hopefully create the space for this anti-commemoration. The first post, which I hope goes up today, will be a sort of contextualization of the different theoretical conflicts in Lithuania at the time. It will be the most generally historical. The second part will be more about the actual results of the declaration of independence, mostly in the way it harmed relationships among various ethnic, religious, and social groups, wondering if the strident nationalist goal of an independent Lithuania was worth it. The third part will be a recovery, trying to imagine what a politically sound V-16 commemoration might feature.
|
|
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2008.02.19 12.38 )
|
|
|
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira
|
|
2008.01.29 11.33 |
 Vilnius already has distinct features. Almost a year ago I wrote that “nothing sets off an identity crisis like a millennial jubilee.” Back then, the subject was figuring out a role for the national and state flags of Lithuania. Now, however, come recommendations from a commission set up by the Lithuanian government on how to rebrand the nation of Lithuania. In my first post on this rebranding, this “extreme makeover,” I looked at the basis of the rebranding: forming a new identity for Lithuania based on the principle of boldness. In the second post, I looked at the possibility of renaming Lithuania to something more approachable in English.Now it is time to look at the few concrete examples that have already made it into the press. I have absurdly varying levels of commitment to each of the proposals, but I can already guarantee that the large bulk of this final post will be about the trying to get a Guggenheim Museum to come to Lithuania.
|
|
Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2008.01.30 09.01 )
|
|
Skaityti toliau...
|
|
|
<< Pradėti < Prieš 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kitas > Pabaiga >>
|
| Rezultatai 21 - 24 iš 125 |