Kopfbereich

Direkt zum Inhalt Direkt zur Navigation
CLJS has opened up their online t-shirt store. Buy one of their popular "Statue of Liberty" t-shirts for only $10 with your credit card or PayPal account online!
 

Inhalt

inCulto Welcomed to America II: The Implications Spausdinti El. paštas
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 1
PrastasGeriausias 
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2006.12.06 15.08
Digg!

Reddit!

Del.icio.us!

Google!

Facebook!

Technorati!

Yahoo!

Image
Shiny, shiny pants and bleach-blond hair.
There's a rush to finish up part 2 of the inCulto visit here so that I can start tackling the recent decision from the Lithuanian Supreme Court about the possibility of getting Lithuanian citizenship for people like me (descendents of refugees during World War II). This rush is also convenient, since I'm not sure what to say on a broader, more intellectual level about the inCulto concert. But a few points must be made, regarding what the concert taught CLJS, and what it suggests about the future possibility of importing cultural content from Lithuania.

CLJS lost money on the concert. They were short on the ticket count. I don't think the organization was particularly lavish or extravagant, though some costs did spiral out of control. Simply put, 300 people at an inCulto concert is an insult, both to the amount of publicity CLJS did (and spent money on), and to the quality of the performance. Blame for the scarce turnout can go in lots of directions: Thanksgiving is a busy time, the Sabre Room is an unknown venue, and so on. I don't, personally, think that the ticket price was a deal-breaker for many people—friends complained to me that they were "too broke" to go to the concert, so that would have been true even if tickets were $10, instead of $35. (Of course, at $10 a ticket, CLJS could have sold out the Sabre Room and ran a larger deficit than it is currently running.)

But there are three interrelated issues about that affected the turnout that I do think need addressing, not as a sort of corrective to CLJS in the future, but as a general critique of the way cultural artifacts are packaged and sold among the diaspora community. In other words, this article isn't so much about whether CLJS was "defeated," but, rather, an attempt to imagine a different role for CLJS such that it can do things like sponsor inCulto concerts. The three remaining issues about turnout were: hype, name recognition, and marketing scope. 

After the concert, a sometime impresario approached me (after I had been identified as a concert organizer) and said to me, "Ką Jūs čia padarėt — tai jėga." I was pretty flattered, and he explained to me that CLJS's main problem regarding turnout was with faulty marketing. I have no idea how the marketing could have been better: CLJS members postered, bought ads in Amerikos lietuvis, and even had Amerikos lietuvis run a front-page article on inCulto's leader, Jurgis Didžiulis Valencia. Cards with concert information were distributed to familiar haunts in the Lithuanian-American community: PLC, Lietuvėlė, Daddy's, Bravo, Smilga, and so on. Nearly every car (some 450) parked at the Mamontovas concert at Willowbrook even got a card under its windshield wiper. This, we in CLJS hoped, would be "enough" to lure in the new immigrants. To cover the DP diaspora community, we used our extensive email and facebook contacts to rope in our friends from summer camp and so on.

But the miscalculation was that, for the concert to succeed, CLJS needed a showing from the new immigrant community, the "third-wavers." My new acquaintance, the impresario, guessed that around 30 people—or about 10% of the audience—were new immigrants (and of them, he said, about seven were people he brought). I don't know about his numbers, but I do know that we exceeded our expectations among the "second-wavers" by about 100, and we still ended up short.

Why didn't third-wavers come? Perhaps the ads were not attractive enough. Perhaps the marketing was executed in too compressed a time—the posters were up for only a couple of weeks. Or perhaps the problem was with name recognition.

As I wrote in my previous post, inCulto are the third most expensive band in Lithuania (after Mamontovas and Skamp). They have cleaned up at Lithuanian music awards over the past two years, their video for "Boogaloo" was the first Lithuanian video on MTV, and they have played before tens of thousands of listeners at festivals in Klaipėda and the like. Yet throughout the marketing of the concert, blank stares exposing a lack of recognition became the norm. Among people I approached, at best, they would know one or two inCulto songs. The sirgaliai were a handful that I had already identified ahead of time. Even among my good friends, many fretted about going to see a concert "for one song" (take your pick of: "Boogaloo," "Suk, suk ratelį," or, in most cases, "Welcome (to Lithuania)." Sadly, inCulto seemed like a novelty act, a band with a cute video, instead of a subversive band calling for a new approach to the Lithuanian imaginary.

The name recognition suggested a severe problem: if potential concert-goers did not recognize the band, then they would have to go on the faith that CLJS would not fly out some Mickey Mouse band. That's a faith that CLJS does not have any right in demanding (sadly) from the population in Chicago. But the organization assumed that name recognition would be a problem only among second-wavers. That it was a problem among third-wavers was a shock—and it quickly became a potentially insurmountable obstacle.

ImageAnd this makes me question whether the marketing for the concert was actually bad. Third-wavers, or, at least, enough of them to sell all the tickets we needed to sell to break even, didn't know inCulto well enough to come out. The ads were there. The posters were up. Knowledge of the concert was readily available, so the lack of interest must be tied into disinterest in the band. And that disinterest, if I had to guess, comes because inCulto doesn't play a sugary pop that lands on summer compilations (like Saulės smūgis). That's the first strike. Compounding the issue is that inCulto is a new band—the most generous age for the band is still just over three years. Mamontovas, on the other hand, has been performing in front of Lithuanian audiences for twenty years. Everyone has heard of Mamontovas, no matter when you left Lithuania. Unless you're a pop music junkie (like me), it's almost impossible to have heard of inCulto if you left Lithuania more than three years ago. This is why Mamontovas sells tickets, and this is why Skamp sell tickets. It's not just that they are established; they also have a history that they can call on for a fanbase.

It's a simple question of exposure. Mamontovas gets tons of exposure, in a self-perpetuating cycle, because of his previous accomplishments. There is nothing so fantastic about his new album, from which most of his concerts in the US this time drew their setlists, that explains why twice as many people turned out to pay $40 to see him than to see inCulto here in Chicago. But he's an institution, despite aesthetic irrelevance (save LT United, which is possibly a final droplet of genius quickly evaporating).

inCulto, on the other hand, are reinventing the very idea (and limits) of Lithuanian pop, in a project that is both politically intriguing and booty-shaking. While Mamontovas whines along like he has for the past decade, inCulto are getting asses on the dancefloor, doing something hardly ever seen in Lithuanian popular music—something other than Mamontovo AOR or teeny-bopper būmčik (I don't mean to be so harsh on Mamontovas, but I'm trying to point out the intense differences in the concerts).

But at the risk of sounding whiny—"why don't people come to cool concerts?"—I want to point out that this is a very serious problem. While spending time with the band, we got to talking about having a sort of music festival out here. They were excited about the idea and immediately started naming groups that would be good, but it was all groups that I had never heard of. Yes, they would be cheaper than inCulto, but if we can't even break even bringing in a band with their name recognition, how on earth could CLJS expect to bring a group like, say, Pieno lazeriai out? As a result, then, it becomes economically infeasible to bring any acts over unless they already have insane name recognition among the Lithuanian community. So, in other words, expect to see a lot of Mamontovas concerts and little else, with an occasional Cicinas show to mix things up.

Image
Wouldn't you pay to see this man?
This is a situation that, frankly, sucks. Sure, I have some Cicinas tracks and so on, but I don't find him interesting enough to promote a concert featuring him—nor do I think CLJS should suffer the damage to its brand name that having a Cicinas show would produce. But that's where the money is. It doesn't matter that Saldi.Juoda.Naktis is boring and derivative; if you want 800 people at a concert, you bring Mamontovas.

There's nothing unique about this, of course. It would be absurd to expect a group like, say, the Brazilian Girls (who played a sold-out show at the Metro the night after the inCulto concert) to fill a stadium. But is the difference between the 1000-ish Metro and a 30k stadium the same as the difference between 300 people at inCulto and 800 at Mamontovas? The margin of difference is so small, in real numbers, that it doesn't make sense why it can't be covered.

But if an audience needs to be generated, and the third-wavers, for whatever reason (and there are unspoken reasons here, too), won't make up that audience, then the scope of the marketing needs to be changed. Jurgis suggested this to me when we were discussing his plans for inCulto. Forget the traditional media, he said, and build a community on your own terms. Don't rely on (in our diaspora argot) "an ad in Draugas." Build your own marketing, your own word of mouth, your own avenues for publicity. This is only partly achieved by postering and cards and spamming emails. These are all tired avenues—and, to be sure, inCulto posters competed with many, many other posters (though CLJS's were, visually, the best, in my opinion) at Smilga and the like. CLJS is sort of trying to build a new community, but it hasn't been the central point of a marketing strategy. It looks like it will have to be. No matter how nice Amerikos lietuvis is to it, if CLJS wants to pull off a high-risk proposition, the organization can't rely on them.

Jurgis further mentioned something that had never occurred to me: market the show to people other than Lithuanians and Lithuanian-Americans. The band, after all, was producing a universally appreciable cultural product—most of the songs were in English or Spanish! Personally, I tried to get some non-Lithuanians to come, but the idea of a non-Lithuanian appeal to the concert was not at all a part of the marketing strategy, much less a focus. But it should have been. I'm not sure CLJS could've gotten "Vanilla" in the rotation at WXRT, but posters in English in locations other than Lithuanian haunts would have helped this immensely. The band, after all, as Jurgis said, are "third world cool," and that has a certain (slightly problematic) appeal that transcends the Lithuanian community. Other concessions would have had to have been made: the concert would have had to have been at a venue in the city, like the Park West, for example. But it may have been possible.

There's a second aspect to widening the marketing scope: it turns the concert from a "Lithuanian event" that "Lithuanians" may feel obligated to attend (like so many awful and boring artistic events I attended in my youth) to a "concert event" that people attend since they want to. The potential public becomes much larger, and the rate of return is (hence) larger. But the issue remains one of marketing. Everyone who saw the inCulto concert had a great time, and it's a shame that there were so few of them.

Still, if these sorts of moves are not taken, then it will be remain impossible to bring any kind of cultural producers from Lithuania except the sure bets—who are usually aesthetically already bankrupt. That's not a path that we should be eagerly looking forward to walking down.

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2006.12.06 16.10 )