| CLJS has opened up their online t-shirt store. Buy one of their popular "Statue of Liberty" t-shirts for only $10 with your credit card or PayPal account online! |
| inCulto Welcomed to America II: The Implications |
|
|
| Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira | |
| 2006.12.06 15.08 | |
![]() Shiny, shiny pants and bleach-blond hair. CLJS lost money on the concert. They were short on the ticket count. I don't think the organization was particularly lavish or extravagant, though some costs did spiral out of control. Simply put, 300 people at an inCulto concert is an insult, both to the amount of publicity CLJS did (and spent money on), and to the quality of the performance. Blame for the scarce turnout can go in lots of directions: Thanksgiving is a busy time, the Sabre Room is an unknown venue, and so on. I don't, personally, think that the ticket price was a deal-breaker for many people—friends complained to me that they were "too broke" to go to the concert, so that would have been true even if tickets were $10, instead of $35. (Of course, at $10 a ticket, CLJS could have sold out the Sabre Room and ran a larger deficit than it is currently running.) But there are three interrelated issues about that affected the turnout that I do think need addressing, not as a sort of corrective to CLJS in the future, but as a general critique of the way cultural artifacts are packaged and sold among the diaspora community. In other words, this article isn't so much about whether CLJS was "defeated," but, rather, an attempt to imagine a different role for CLJS such that it can do things like sponsor inCulto concerts. The three remaining issues about turnout were: hype, name recognition, and marketing scope. After the concert, a sometime impresario approached me (after I had been identified as a concert organizer) and said to me, "Ką Jūs čia padarėt — tai jėga." I was pretty flattered, and he explained to me that CLJS's main problem regarding turnout was with faulty marketing. I have no idea how the marketing could have been better: CLJS members postered, bought ads in Amerikos lietuvis, and even had Amerikos lietuvis run a front-page article on inCulto's leader, Jurgis Didžiulis Valencia. Cards with concert information were distributed to familiar haunts in the Lithuanian-American community: PLC, Lietuvėlė, Daddy's, Bravo, Smilga, and so on. Nearly every car (some 450) parked at the Mamontovas concert at Willowbrook even got a card under its windshield wiper. This, we in CLJS hoped, would be "enough" to lure in the new immigrants. To cover the DP diaspora community, we used our extensive email and facebook contacts to rope in our friends from summer camp and so on. Why didn't third-wavers come? Perhaps the ads were not attractive enough. Perhaps the marketing was executed in too compressed a time—the posters were up for only a couple of weeks. Or perhaps the problem was with name recognition. ![]() Wouldn't you pay to see this man? There's nothing unique about this, of course. It would be absurd to expect a group like, say, the Brazilian Girls (who played a sold-out show at the Metro the night after the inCulto concert) to fill a stadium. But is the difference between the 1000-ish Metro and a 30k stadium the same as the difference between 300 people at inCulto and 800 at Mamontovas? The margin of difference is so small, in real numbers, that it doesn't make sense why it can't be covered. But if an audience needs to be generated, and the third-wavers, for whatever reason (and there are unspoken reasons here, too), won't make up that audience, then the scope of the marketing needs to be changed. Jurgis suggested this to me when we were discussing his plans for inCulto. Forget the traditional media, he said, and build a community on your own terms. Don't rely on (in our diaspora argot) "an ad in Draugas." Build your own marketing, your own word of mouth, your own avenues for publicity. This is only partly achieved by postering and cards and spamming emails. These are all tired avenues—and, to be sure, inCulto posters competed with many, many other posters (though CLJS's were, visually, the best, in my opinion) at Smilga and the like. CLJS is sort of trying to build a new community, but it hasn't been the central point of a marketing strategy. It looks like it will have to be. No matter how nice Amerikos lietuvis is to it, if CLJS wants to pull off a high-risk proposition, the organization can't rely on them. Jurgis further mentioned something that had never occurred to me: market the show to people other than Lithuanians and Lithuanian-Americans. The band, after all, was producing a universally appreciable cultural product—most of the songs were in English or Spanish! Personally, I tried to get some non-Lithuanians to come, but the idea of a non-Lithuanian appeal to the concert was not at all a part of the marketing strategy, much less a focus. But it should have been. I'm not sure CLJS could've gotten "Vanilla" in the rotation at WXRT, but posters in English in locations other than Lithuanian haunts would have helped this immensely. The band, after all, as Jurgis said, are "third world cool," and that has a certain (slightly problematic) appeal that transcends the Lithuanian community. Other concessions would have had to have been made: the concert would have had to have been at a venue in the city, like the Park West, for example. But it may have been possible. There's a second aspect to widening the marketing scope: it turns the concert from a "Lithuanian event" that "Lithuanians" may feel obligated to attend (like so many awful and boring artistic events I attended in my youth) to a "concert event" that people attend since they want to. The potential public becomes much larger, and the rate of return is (hence) larger. But the issue remains one of marketing. Everyone who saw the inCulto concert had a great time, and it's a shame that there were so few of them. Still, if these sorts of moves are not taken, then it will be remain impossible to bring any kind of cultural producers from Lithuania except the sure bets—who are usually aesthetically already bankrupt. That's not a path that we should be eagerly looking forward to walking down. |
|
| Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2006.12.06 16.10 ) |