Kopfbereich

Direkt zum Inhalt Direkt zur Navigation
CLJS has opened up their online t-shirt store. Buy one of their popular "Statue of Liberty" t-shirts for only $10 with your credit card or PayPal account online!
 

Inhalt

World Cup Pool Results, Thoughts Spausdinti El. paštas
Vartotojų vertinimas: / 0
PrastasGeriausias 
Įrašė Moacir P. de Sá Pereira   
2006.07.10 08.26
Digg!

Reddit!

Del.icio.us!

Google!

Facebook!

Technorati!

Yahoo!

ImageI sort of decided on what to do about the World Cup Pool. As I alluded in a previous post, I was rather unexpectedly absent from the internets for two whole weeks. This hurt the pool obviously because I was unable to update second round matchups. As such, I've decided to declare a winner based solely on group-play and response to the prop questions. The final standings, then, are: 

 UsernamePts.
1.natalia
2393
2.
Andrius
2214
3.
aidask
2180
4.
jlmorgen
1712
5.
genna778
1661
6.
lituanicakid
1646
7.
fidelio
1611
8.
aukse
1518
9.
JonJon
1481
10.
jonasgrigs
1390

 I can blame no one but myself for my own sorry performance. I got none of the props right (Adriano for Golden Boot?!?), and I don't think I even put in a point guess for the final six matches or so. 

Since the pool was for, effectively, only half of the World Cup, only half a prize will be awarded. It's up to Natalia to figure out a way to claim her prize.

On the flip, if anyone cares, I'll expound more on the World Cup. 

After a fashion, this was the worst World Cup I've ever watched. Of the final four teams, the only one I could even stand was Germany, and I didn't want them to get a fourth star on home turf. France I loathe for dismissing Brazil (twice, now), Portugal for their generally whiny and dirty play, and Italy... Italy I think was maybe the most cynical ("realist," in Pete's terms) team I've ever seen play. If not for the closing 20 minutes of Portugal v. Holland that I caught at a small bar in the village of Creemore near Lake Huron, I'd say that no team could possibly have been dirtier than the Italians. But I'll get back to the Italians later.

Logistically, this World Cup was, for me at least, intensely difficult to watch, despite the generally good time zone difference. I was able to rig together a bootleg means of watching ESPN2 streams over the internet, so being at work was not a hindrance. Leaving for the World Lithuanian Youth Congress, however, was a major hindrance. Not only did watching matches suddenly become much more difficult (if not impossible), but keeping up with the Cup itself became an exercise in futility. All the ancillary reading I'd been doing online came to an abrupt halt as soon as I boarded a plane for Toronto.

Image
Clint Dempsey scores. AFP.
And while getting ready for that flight, it was in line at the airport that I saw the US score their only goal of the tournament. United was broadcasting the match on their giant screens usually reserved for flight information. As the US scored, there was a quiet cheer that made it through the entire terminal—as though no one wanted to be seen paying attention to soccer while in line at the airport. Once I made it through security, I was able to watch the bulk of the US collapse at a bar that was, I kid you not, standing room only. It was truly surprising to see an airport bar get packed to the gills with everyone watching the US. The Italy match was on another screen, and no one even turned an eye toward it. All eyes were on Arena's futility. (My flight touched down in Toronto just as Brazil were kicking off against Japan—a one-hour weather delay ruined the perfect timing I'd devised—so I was unable to see the first half of that match.)

It was sad to see the US go out like that, but they were outplayed by both the Czech Republic and Ghana. Still, tying Italy might stand as one of the most remarkable achievements in US Soccer history—something that even the ESPN/ABC announcers did not recognize at the end of the match. Italy played a brutal match, and though the US had to rely on an own-goal to level it, they still managed to keep Italy from claiming the three points you know they felt they were entitled to while also a man down.

But my team is, and has always been, Brazil. I don't really know what to say about their performance in this Cup. They clearly snoozed through the first round—one of the Canadian announcers referred to the goal flurry against Japan as retribution for daring to pinch the lion on the tail (Japan's opening score). And they definitely kicked the offense up a notch against Ghana (a match I snuck out of Kongresas to watch at a small Italian deli on the beach). But Ghana was outclassed rather obviously, and once they were a man down, it seemed like Brazil decided to try to dish out goals to all the players—why else was Lucio crashing the net like he was in the closing minutes?

Image
Brazil, 1986. TOFFS.
Still, because of my being away from the world, when I flew back to Chicago just in time to catch the opening minutes of Brazil v. France at the hotel bar in the Sheraton Towers in Chicago, I turned to no one in particular and asked, "who's hurt that they're playing a 4-5-1?" Did Parreira think that Brazil had shown too much offense against Ghana and needed to dial it down? Against France? And dial the offense down they did, not getting a single shot on net, I think, until Adriano came in around the 60th minute. With the addition of Adriano and Robinho, the offense came alive, but it was too little, too late. Barthez is soft, but not that soft, and with Brazil on the ropes, they started forcing too much. And there you go. Proud of what little Brazil had accomplished (I mean, is the Round of Eight such a let down?), I kept my TOFFS 1986 replica shirt (with Sócrates's number) on for the rest of the night. That shirt I wore every day Brazil played, and it had only let me down once.

Once I started reading reactions, however, it became clear that the 4-5-1 was not the result of injury. Further, it wasn't properly a 4-5-1, but more of a 4-4-1-1, with Ronaldinho playing more as a striker. Well, I didn't see it. I saw Ronaldo alone up front, looking for the ball. I saw a confused team unable to click on offense. The Brazilian media was ruthless, but I think this one headline sums up everything I thought of the match: "Parreira mexeu na equipe, que, apática, assistiu a show de Zidane." "Mexer" is a verb that means something along the lines of, idiomatically, "to mess with." It is what my father would tell me to stop doing when I'd be picking at a scab. And it's the perfect description for what Parreira did. Why mess with something that had conceded a mere goal in four matches and was cruising along perfectly well? And if you are going to screw around, why keep in Ronaldo, who, despite his performance against Ghana, still didn't look sharp (though neither did Adriano—you have a lot to battle back from come South Africa, young man)?

But it all boils down to Italy, the dirtiest team I've seen play. "Cheat to win" was this side's credo, and it started right from the word go. Other teams with traditions of histrionic diving (Portugal, Argentina) at least back up their flopping with some sort of flash of offense—Argentina's opportunistic running up of the score even convinced many that they were the team to beat at this World Cup. Italy showed none of that. Their goal against the US came from a set piece delivered by, what else, a flop outside the area. Dive, set-piece, goal. Cheat to win.

Image
Cheat to win. AFP.
My brother tell me that his fiancée, herself a die-hard Italy fan, refused to watch her team after the flop in extra time against Australia. Perhaps that's a sort of tip of the hat to the threat of the Socceroos, but I doubt it. That said, at least Italy played a relatively clean match against France, though I'm very eager to know what on earth must have happened to lead Zidane to charge like a bull and get a red card. I can see how playing against the Italians can be frustrating as hell—they refuse to go away, yet they're not at all fun to watch (unless, of course, like at least two of my friends did, you're watching them since they're hot). Cynical, I think, remains the best adjective for the team.

Sure, I'm bitter. I wish Brazil were in the final. I think Brazil would have made quick work of Portugal, and I think they would have outlasted Italy. I'm also bitter that Brazil no longer stands two stars above all the other teams. Julie Foudy made some sort of comment after the Italians won that it had been a relief after years of futility, seeing that Italy hadn't won in over 20 years. But that's kind of ridiculous, no? Still, for me to go on in parsing that would involve my starting in on the astonishingly sorry state of soccer announcing in the US. I don't think I want to go there.

 APPENDIX:

 I found this sort of interesting. I watched matches of the 2006 World Cup at:

1. My office (Chicago, IL)

2. The "Hyde Park Center" of the Chicago Graduate School of Business (Chicago, IL)

3. My apartment (Pilsen, IL)

4. Cuernavaca Restaurant (Pilsen, IL)

5. Some evil bar in University Village (Gentrified, IL)

6. O'Hare airport (Chicago, IL)

7. Ruslys household (Mississauga, ON)

8. Molly Bloom's (Toronto, ON)

9. Some bar (Creemore, ON)

10. Rocco's deli (Wasaga, ON)

11. Some hotel (Hamilton, ON) 

12. Pearson Int'l Airport (Toronto, ON)

13. Sheraton Towers (Chicago, IL)

14. Stray Dog (New Buffalo, MI) 

15. Saud's apt. (Bridgeport, IL) 

Paskutinį kartą atnaujinta ( 2006.07.10 09.51 )